Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Study Settings View Stats

Topic

Question Type

Essay Multiple Choice

Question Source

All Jurisprudence based

0 tracked cards Civil Law and Land Titles and Deeds

Nova Metro Title Co. signs a two-year exclusive contract with Shoreline Estates to perform title clearance and encumbrance checks for a coastal development. Rival SecureTitle, upon learning of the contract terms, approaches Shoreline's procurement head with a substantial cash incentive and disseminates forged reports alleging repeated title-clearing errors by Nova Metro to induce Shoreline to terminate the contract and hire SecureTitle. Shoreline breaches after nine months, causing Nova Metro to lose anticipated profits and incur costs to secure a replacement service. (a) Identify the doctrine governing liability for SecureTitle’s conduct and list its essential elements. (b) Distinguish this doctrine from legitimate competition and explain what constitutes improper means in this context. (c) Apply to the facts: is SecureTitle liable for tortious interference with contract? What damages may be recoverable, and what defenses might apply?

Choose the Best Answer

Tortious interference with prospective contractual relations, requiring (i) a reasonable expectancy of contract, (ii) defendant’s knowledge, (iii) intentional interference, and (iv) damages; this is less fitting here since a binding contract existed. Unfair competition under the Civil Code, requiring misrepresentation or confusion and acts designed to mislead the market; not ordinarily invoked for a private contract breach, so this would not be the proper remedy for the present facts. Interference with contract (tortious interference) under the Philippine quasi-delict framework (Art. 2176); essential elements are: (1) a valid contract; (2) defendant’s knowledge of the contract; (3) intentional interference by improper means to induce a breach; (4) breach occurred; (5) plaintiff’s damages; (6) a causal link between the interference and the breach; and (7) absence of privilege or justification for the interference. On the facts, SecureTitle is liable; recoverable damages include actual losses such as Nova Metro’s lost profits for the remaining term and the costs to secure a replacement service; defenses include legitimate competition in good faith and absence of improper means. General negligence-based liability under Articles 19 and 20 (fault or negligence), which is a broader theory and less precise for deliberate interference with contract than the quasi-delict theory; this is not the best framing for the facts.

Load another random question

Your Progress

No data Retention

Tracked Cards: 0
Accuracy: No data
Retained: 0

View Detailed Analytics

Difficulty Breakdown

Answer flashcards to build a real score-based difficulty breakdown.

Current Streak 0 Days

Start a streak with this card.

Suggested Decks

View All

Leech Cards

Review

No recent weak flashcards in your saved workbook.

More

Flashcards Studio

Question

Choose the Best Answer

Hello