Flashcards Studio
Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.
Question
Two Philippine corporations, Quanta Labs, Inc. (QL) and Apexa Components, Inc. (ACI), share a director who sits on both boards. That same director is also a director of Apexa’s supplier, PrimeTech Ltd. (PTL). QL enters into a two-year exclusive licensing agreement with PTL for a patented manufacturing process used to produce a line of sensors, at 26% above current market rate. The director discloses his interest to both boards but does not abstain from voting; no independent monitor or disinterested director review is arranged, and both boards approve the deal. The arrangement would divert profits to PTL and affect QL’s minority stockholders. (a) Identify the controlling doctrine governing dealings between corporations with interlocking directors and the type of fiduciary breach at issue. (b) Distinguish this doctrine from general related-party transaction rules. (c) Apply to these facts: is the contract valid or voidable, and what remedies may be available to the aggrieved party?