Flashcards Studio
Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.
Question
Xeno Harbor Resources, Inc., a Philippine-registered corporation, has 60% Filipino-owned capital and 40% foreign-owned capital. It signs a concession contract with the State to explore and develop offshore petroleum deposits within the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The government approves the concession. After ten months, a Filipino minority investor challenges the validity of the concession, arguing that Xeno Harbor’s ownership structure does not satisfy the constitutional requirement for private participation in exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources. (a) Identify the controlling doctrine governing exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources and the ownership requirement. (b) Apply the rule to Xeno Harbor’s ownership structure and determine whether the concession complies with the constitutional requirement. (c) If the Filipino ownership is nominal and foreigners exercise real control through a trust or nominee arrangement, discuss how the courts would evaluate compliance and what consequences could follow.