Flashcards Studio

Two civil actions are pending in the Regional Trial Court, Branch 9, Cebu City: Action A (Marigold Realty, Inc. v. Santos) for reconveyance of Lot 210 and possession; Action B (Santos v. Marigold Realty, Inc.) for damages arising from the same encroachment on Lot 210. The actions involve common questions of law and fact (title to Lot 210, possession, and the encroachment) and are in the same court. A single motion to consolidate under Rule 31 is filed; Santos opposes, arguing that the remedies and parties are distinct and consolidation would prejudice their rights. (a) Decide whether consolidation is proper under Rule 31, explaining the controlling standard and the circumstances in which it may be ordered. (b) If consolidation is proper, describe the effect on pleadings, trial, and entry of judgments; if not, state the appropriate alternative. (c) If consolidation would prejudice any party, set out the grounds for severance and the procedure the court should follow.