Flashcards Studio

In a criminal case for estafa, the People seek to admit a printed transcript of an armored-car company’s digital access log showing entry times to the vehicle depot, which allegedly correspond to the accused. The original digital log resides on the company’s server abroad and is temporarily inaccessible due to maintenance work. A local technician printed the relevant portion from the provider’s web interface and certified that the printout faithfully reproduces the log as of a specific timestamp. The defense objects on authentication and on the operation of the best evidence rule, arguing that Uniformity of Evidentiary Rules under Rule 128 should not be bypassed. The trial court overrules the objection, citing Uniformity of Evidentiary Rules under Rule 128 and admits the printout as secondary evidence. (a) Identify the doctrine and controlling rule on Uniformity of Evidentiary Rules. (b) Apply it to the facts: should the printed transcript be admissible under the uniform evidentiary framework as secondary evidence, and what conditions must be satisfied for secondary evidence to prove the contents of the original when the original is unavailable? (c) If the printed transcript is not admissible as offered, state the proper method to prove the contents of the log consistent with uniform rules.