Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Study Settings View Stats

Topic

Question Type

Essay Multiple Choice

Question Source

All Jurisprudence based

0 tracked cards Remedial Law, Legal and Judicial Ethics, with Practical Exercises

In a civil action for breach of contract arising from a software development project, Plaintiff P sues Defendant S, a corporation, for ₱1,400,000. The project manager of S, using S's letterhead, prepares a memo dated March 15, 2026: “We acknowledge the delay in delivering the software and promise to compensate P in the amount of ₱1,400,000 by April 30, 2026.” The memo is kept in S’s project-control file under Settlement/Claims. Plaintiff offers the memo as (1) a party-opponent admission, and (2) a business record kept in the ordinary course of business. Defendant objects on hearsay and contends it cannot be admitted for multiple purposes. (a) Identify the doctrine of multiple admissibility and explain its reach in Philippine evidence law. (b) For each proposed use, specify the governing ground(s) and the essential conditions for admissibility. (c) Applying the doctrine to these facts, should the court admit the memo for both proposed uses? If admitted, what limiting instructions or cautions, if any, should accompany its use?

Choose the Best Answer

The doctrine of multiple admissibility does not apply here; a document may be admitted only under one evidentiary ground, and because the memo relates to a settlement of liability, it cannot be used as a business record or as a party admission for multiple purposes. The doctrine applies only to writings that are duplicates of the same event; here the memo concerns a future payment promise and thus cannot be admitted for multiple purposes. The doctrine of multiple admissibility allows a single document to be admitted for more than one purpose, with each use grounded on a separate exceptions (e.g., party-admission and business-record). If a document satisfies the conditions for both grounds, the court may admit it for both uses and give limiting instructions to distinguish the purposes. The doctrine covers only admissibility as a public document and a private document; since the memo is a private document, it cannot be used as a public-record basis and thus cannot be admitted for multiple purposes.

Load another random question

Your Progress

No data Retention

Tracked Cards: 0
Accuracy: No data
Retained: 0

View Detailed Analytics

Difficulty Breakdown

Answer flashcards to build a real score-based difficulty breakdown.

Current Streak 0 Days

Start a streak with this card.

Suggested Decks

View All

Leech Cards

Review

No recent weak flashcards in your saved workbook.

More

Flashcards Studio

Question

Choose the Best Answer

Hello