Log In Create Account
Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Question Type
Question Source
0 tracked cards Political and Public International Law
Next

Question

An administrative complaint is filed with the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) against a city mayor for misappropriation of calamity funds. After a formal investigation, the OSP issues an order dismissing the case for lack of probable cause, stating that the record fails to show credible evidence of wrongdoing. The complainant challenges the dismissal by filing a petition for certiorari under Rule 65, asserting grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction. The OSP maintains that the ruling is a proper exercise of discretion and not subject to review on the merits. (a)Identify the controlling doctrine governing judicial review of OSP administrative proceedings. (b)Distinguish between grave abuse of discretion and mere error of judgment, and indicate which standard applies in this context. (c)Apply the doctrine to the facts: Should the Supreme Court grant relief via certiorari, and why or why not?

Choose the Best Answer

Clara

Hello