Flashcards Studio
Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.
Question
City of San Villar forms San Villar Riverfront Development Corporation (SVRDC), a stock corporation in which the City owns 55% and a private developer owns 45%. SVRDC is authorized to acquire land, develop, own, and operate a riverfront district, ferry terminal, and related facilities within the city’s boundaries, and to grant concessions for the use of the facilities. The City contributes cash and a parcel of riverfront land; the private developer contributes cash and technical expertise. SVRDC then signs a 25-year concession with the private developer to operate the ferry terminal and riverfront facilities and to collect tolls, with profits shared between the parties. No competitive bidding was conducted for the concession, and the land title to the project site is projected to be transferred to SVRDC. A resident challenges the arrangement on grounds that the City cannot form and fund a corporation with a private partner to operate a riverfront district without proper procurement and public land procedures, and that the venture may improperly divert public resources for private gain. (a) Is the City’s act of forming and owning this corporation for the riverfront project within its corporate powers under Philippine law? (b) If permissible, what are the controlling prerequisites and limitations that must govern such corporate power—particularly with respect to public purpose, procurement, and land use? (c) What is the effect on third parties, including contract partners and lenders, if the corporate act or the concession exceeds the scope of authority or bypasses required procedures?