Flashcards Studio
Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.
Question
Accused S, a municipal procurement officer, is charged in a criminal information with falsification of public documents for forging a delivery receipt in connection with a P2,000,000 supply contract with a private supplier. A civil action for damages based on the same alleged falsification has been filed by the Municipality in the Regional Trial Court, seeking P2,000,000 plus interest. The civil action raises as essential issues whether the delivery receipt and the procurement contract actually existed and whether the procurement was properly authorized. (a) Identify the doctrine involved and the controlling rule. (b) Do a prejudicial question analysis: does a prejudicial question exist in these facts? Explain with the elements and reasoning. (c) If a prejudicial question exists, what is the proper procedural remedy and why? If no prejudicial question exists, outline the alternative path for the prosecution.