Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Study Settings View Stats

Topic

Question Type

Essay Multiple Choice

Question Source

All Jurisprudence based

0 tracked cards Remedial Law, Legal and Judicial Ethics, with Practical Exercises

A complaint-affidavit charges private individual G with estafa through deceit (Article 315, paragraph 2, 2nd sentence). Facts: The complainant F paid PHP 4,500,000 to G to secure delivery of a rare vintage car advertised online as having a valid title and VIN. G issued a receipt and promised delivery within 25 days. After 40 days, no delivery; G returned PHP 800,000, claiming the balance covered “customs and logistics.” Bank records show a PHP 4,500,000 deposit into G’s personal savings account on the date of the transaction. There is no bill of sale or title transfer; The car’s existence and title are not verifiable; An independent witness, a former employee of the seller’s business, testifies that G has never delivered such a vehicle and that the business license appeared suspended; There is no independent corroboration that F and G had a debt or loan. G’s explanations are inconsistent; A text message shows G assuring delivery but offering no verifiable documents. Based on DOJ Circular No. 2024-015 and DOJ Circular No. 2024-028, answer: (a) whether the facts establish a prima facie case with reasonable certainty of conviction; (b) if not, what additional evidence would be necessary to meet that standard; (c) what action the prosecutor should take in the preliminary investigation.

Choose the Best Answer

Yes; there is prima facie evidence of deceit demonstrated by misrepresentation about the item’s existence and title, the recipient’s money transfer, and the non-delivery despite promises, supported by independent corroboration; the prosecutor should initiate the preliminary investigation and prepare to file information if the evidence remains sufficient. No; there is no prima facie case because the elements of estafa through deceit are not satisfied without a signed bill of sale or title transfer, and the absence of a contract or title precludes proving deceit; the prosecutor should require a signed sale contract and title before continuing the preliminary investigation. Yes; the facts establish a prima facie case with reasonable certainty of conviction for estafa through deceit, given the misrepresentation of existence/delivery of the car, the receipt of money, the absence of delivery, the partial refund, the bank deposit, and corroboration from an independent witness; the prosecutor should proceed with a formal preliminary investigation and file information in court if the evidence sustains the charge. Yes; the combination of deceitful representations, non-delivery, and the independent witness’s testimony supporting a pattern of deceit strengthens the prima facie case; the prosecutor should move forward with a formal preliminary investigation and, if warranted, file information.

Load another random question

Your Progress

No data Retention

Tracked Cards: 0
Accuracy: No data
Retained: 0

View Detailed Analytics

Difficulty Breakdown

Answer flashcards to build a real score-based difficulty breakdown.

Current Streak 0 Days

Start a streak with this card.

Suggested Decks

View All

Leech Cards

Review

No recent weak flashcards in your saved workbook.

More

Flashcards Studio

Question

Choose the Best Answer

Hello