Flashcards Studio

In a busy city bus terminal, plainclothes officers detain a man, Ramon Villegas, without a warrant and without establishing probable cause, claiming he discarded a packet believed to contain illegal drugs. Villegas is brought to the police station and held in custody. At booking, Villegas neither objects to the arrest nor to the manner of arrest. In custody, the police question him and obtain a written confession. They also seize Villegas’ smartphone, from which text messages are later used to link him to a drug distribution network. The defense moves to suppress the drugs, the in-custody statements, and the smartphone messages on the ground that the arrest was illegal for lack of probable cause and absence of a warrant. Advise on waiver of objections to irregularities: (a) Identify the controlling doctrine on waiver of objections to irregularities in arrest and subsequent proceedings; (b) Distinguish which irregularities may be waived and which cannot; (c) Apply the doctrine to the facts and determine whether Villegas’ failure to object at booking constitutes a waiver, and the effect on the admissibility of the drugs and the in-custody statements and the smartphone messages.