Log In Create Account
Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Question Type
Question Source
0 tracked cards Remedial Law, Legal and Judicial Ethics, with Practical Exercises
Next

Question

Facts: A is charged in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) with robbery by information I1. After arraignment, the court dismisses I1 for insufficiency of evidence, but the dismissal is with the express consent of A. The People then file information I2 in the same RTC charging A with homicide for the same incident. A moves to quash I2 on the ground of double jeopardy. (a)Identify the controlling doctrine and the controlling rule. (b)Distinguish double jeopardy from related doctrines (e.g., res judicata, former conviction, lesser-included offenses) and explain why they are or are not controlling in this scenario. (c)Apply the doctrine to the facts: should the second information be quashed? Why or why not?

Choose the Best Answer

Clara

Hello