Log In Create Account
Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Question Type
Question Source
0 tracked cards Remedial Law, Legal and Judicial Ethics, with Practical Exercises
Next

Question

In a criminal case for estafa through misappropriation, the prosecution and the accused sign a written pre-trial agreement under Rule 118 providing: (i) the prosecution will drop a related charge arising from the same scheme; (ii) the accused will plead guilty to a lesser offense of estafa; (iii) the defense will stipulate to certain evidentiary facts and forego presenting a defense witness. The court, after a brief inquiry, approves the agreement in writing. Later, the accused claims he did not fully understand the terms due to a medical condition and asserts his counsel coerced him into signing. The trial proceeds and sentencing occurs in accordance with the agreement. For purposes of evaluating such pre-trial agreements, which of the following statements best captures the controlling doctrine and the available remedies if a lack of voluntary consent is established?

Choose the Best Answer

Clara

Hello