Flashcards Studio

During a criminal case for kidnapping with serious illegal detention, the pre-trial conference is scheduled under Rule 118. The People and the offended party appear; the accused, Juan Dela Cruz, fails to appear and is not represented by counsel. The pre-trial conference proceeds in the accused’s absence and the court drafts a pre-trial order listing admitted facts, stipulations, and the calendar for trial. A week later, the accused moves to set aside the pre-trial order on the ground that his non-appearance was due to a grave and justifiable cause (e.g., sudden hospitalization or official assignment) and attaches supporting documents. The prosecution opposes. (a) Identify the controlling doctrine governing non-appearance at a pre-trial conference. (b) Distinguish the sanctions or remedies available for non-appearance, including when a continuance or dismissal may be warranted. (c) Apply the doctrine to the facts and determine whether the pre-trial order should be sustained or set aside, and state the proper course of action with brief justification.