Flashcards Studio
Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.
Question
On March 11, 2026, accused Maria L. Cruz is charged with robbery with intimidation in the Regional Trial Court, Branch 29, Iloilo City. She was arraigned and pleaded not guilty. On the date set for trial, Cruz is absent despite valid summons; her counsel is present. After warning the parties that the trial would proceed in Cruz’s absence, the court receives testimony from two prosecution witnesses and Cruz is convicted. Cruz later appears and moves for relief, contending that her trial in absentia violated due process. (a) Identify the controlling doctrine on trial in absentia and the conditions under which it is permissible. (b) Evaluate whether the trial in absentia was properly conducted under these facts, distinguishing permissible circumstances from violations. (c) If the proceeding is defective or the conviction may be challenged, describe the remedies available to Cruz and any limitations.