Flashcards Studio

Facts: A warrant is issued by an RTC judge directing the police to search the residence of Mr. Antonio Cruz at 123 Maple Street for illegal drugs and unlicensed firearms and to seize the same. The warrant specifies the place to be searched as “the living room and the master bedroom on the second floor” and describes the items to be seized as “illegal drugs and unlicensed firearms found therein.” Police arrive at 5:45 a.m.; Cruz is away. The building's janitor, who lives in a staff apartment within the building and has daily access to the unit, grants consent to search “the entire unit.” The officers proceed to search beyond the two specified spaces into the kitchen, storage closet, and bathroom, and seize a pistol from the storage closet and methamphetamine from the bathroom. The defense moves to suppress the evidence as fruits of an unlawful search. (a)Identify the controlling doctrine governing the conduct of this search. (b)Based on the facts, is the search of the storage closet and bathroom valid? Explain your answer, stating the rule on the scope of a search warrant and the consequences of exceeding it. (c)If the court suppresses the evidence, discuss what remedies apply and whether any exception could allow admissibility of the items found.