Flashcards Studio
Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.
Question
In a civil action for damages arising from a malfunctioning software implementation, Plaintiff P sues Defendant V, a software vendor, for ₱2,000,000. The project manager of V, using V’s letterhead, writes a memo dated June 12, 2025: “We acknowledge the defect in the software delivered on June 5, 2025 and promise to remediate at our own cost by August 1, 2025.” The memo is kept in V’s project file under Quality Assurance. Plaintiff offers the memo as (1) a party-opponent admission, and (2) a business record kept in the ordinary course of business. Defendant objects on hearsay and argues it cannot be admitted for multiple purposes. (a) Identify the doctrine of multiple admissibility and explain its reach in Philippine evidence law. (b) For each proposed use, specify the governing ground(s) and the essential conditions for admissibility. (c) Applying the doctrine to these facts, should the court admit the memo for both proposed uses? If admitted, what limiting instructions or cautions, if any, should accompany its use?