Flashcards Studio

A boutique jewelry store burglary occurs at 2:20 a.m. The prosecution offers the following evidences to prove the guilt of the accused: (i)A grainy CCTV frame shows a silhouette wearing a dark hoodie and gloves entering the store and exiting with a jewelry box; the image is not identifiable. (ii)A nearby taxi driver testifies he ferried a person of the accused's height and build from the store's vicinity to a bus stop around 2:45 a.m.; the person cannot positively identify. (iii)The accused testifies he was at a late-night cafe and provides an order receipt showing a purchase at 2:05 a.m.; the cafe confirms the time but says several patrons were present and cannot confirm his identity. (iv)The store inventory shows a particular necklace with serial number N-457 missing; the serial number corresponds to a catalog entry; a lab report notes the item was found later in the possession of a man who refused to identify himself; the police recover the necklace from the accused's home during a search but the defense challenges the chain of custody and argues it could have been planted. (v)A security guard testifies he found footprints leading away from the store toward a nearby alley; the prints resemble the sole of the accused's boots but are not conclusively linked. (a)Identify whether the above evidences are direct or circumstantial and state the controlling rule from Rule 133 on weight and sufficiency. (b)If the evidences are circumstantial, discuss whether the four requisites for circumstantial evidence to convict beyond reasonable doubt are satisfied, and conclude whether the prosecution has proven guilt beyond reasonable doubt.