Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Study Settings View Stats

Topic

Question Type

Essay Multiple Choice

Question Source

All Jurisprudence based

0 tracked cards Remedial Law, Legal and Judicial Ethics, with Practical Exercises

During a campus bookstore robbery, a security guard testifies that the suspect repeatedly glanced toward the emergency exit, tightened his grip on a bag, and moved toward the door as the incident unfolded. The guard adds, 'I think he intended to leave with the books.' Under Rule 130, Part C (Opinion Rule) of the Philippine Rules of Evidence, which of the following statements is correct regarding admissibility of the guard's testimony?

Choose the Best Answer

All three statements are admissible lay opinions because they describe observable conduct and the witness's interpretation of it. The entire testimony is inadmissible because it speculates about the suspect's motives. The guard's observations that the suspect glanced toward the exit and tightened his grip are admissible lay opinions based on perception; the statement that he intended to leave with the books is not admissible as it is an inference about mental state. The observation of the grip on the bag is admissible; the exit glance is inadmissible; the intent statement is inadmissible.

Load another random question

Your Progress

No data Retention

Tracked Cards: 0
Accuracy: No data
Retained: 0

View Detailed Analytics

Difficulty Breakdown

Answer flashcards to build a real score-based difficulty breakdown.

Current Streak 0 Days

Start a streak with this card.

Suggested Decks

View All

Leech Cards

Review

No recent weak flashcards in your saved workbook.

More

Flashcards Studio

Question

Choose the Best Answer

Hello