Flashcards Studio
Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.
Question
Question: Which of the following statements best describes the controlling rule on liability for illegal recruitment under Republic Act No. 8042 (Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act), as amended, and who may be held liable, in the scenario below? Facts: Apextra Recruitment Solutions, a Philippine-based local recruitment entity, arranges overseas employment for Mara Dizon, a Filipino nurse, to work for CurioCare Global in Country Z. Apextra collects a placement fee, signs a contract naming CurioCare Global as the employer and Mara as the employee, and facilitates visa processing. CurioCare Global does not hold a license to recruit in the Philippines and does not hire directly from applicants. Mara travels to Country Z and begins work; CurioCare Global pays only 60% of the promised salary and denies certain benefits. Apextra remains active and unpunished. Which statement most accurately reflects the controlling rule and liability exposure for Apextra and CurioCare in this scenario?