Flashcards Studio

Ordinance No. 302-SN of the City of San Rosas provides: “No person shall engage in any act or conduct that disturbs the public peace, health, traffic flow, or safety within city limits.” Penalties: fines up to PHP 4,000 or imprisonment up to 20 days. On a Sunday morning, street performer A uses a portable speaker to give an aural art demonstration in a busy plaza; a passerby objects that the sound disturbs shoppers and residents, and A is detained by barangay authorities. A challenges the ordinance as void-for-vagueness. (a) Identify the doctrine and the controlling rule. (b) Distinguish void-for-vagueness from overbreadth and evaluate whether the phrase “disturbs the public peace, health, traffic flow, or safety” provides ascertainable standards for enforcement. (c) Apply to A’s facts and determine whether A’s conduct could be punished under the ordinance, or whether the ordinance is void-for-vagueness; if void, discuss possible remedies (e.g., severability or redrafting).