Flashcards Studio
Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.
Question
Delta Tech, Inc., a private corporation, executed a General Power of Attorney No. GT-POA-18-10 authorizing its Vice President for Operations to sign contracts on behalf of the corporation. The original GPOA No. GT-POA-18-10 was kept in the corporate records. A wildfire on January 5, 2025 destroys the file room, and the original GPOA is lost; only a certified true copy of GT-POA-18-10 remains in Delta Tech’s records. In a civil action by Nova Leasing, Inc. to enforce a contract signed by the VP under the GPOA, Delta Tech seeks to prove the GPOA’s terms by the certified copy. (a) Identify the controlling doctrine about original documents and secondary evidence that applies to this fact pattern. (b) Is the certified true copy admissible to prove the GPOA’s terms? State the conditions that must be satisfied, and the role of the destruction of the original. (c) If the copy is not admissible as offered, what other documentary evidence or steps could properly prove the GPOA’s terms under the same doctrine?