Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Study Settings View Stats

Topic

Question Type

Essay Multiple Choice

Question Source

All Jurisprudence based

0 tracked cards Labor and Social Legislation

A software development firm in Metro Manila implements a policy that eligibility for its prestigious "Future Leaders Track" (FLT) is limited to employees who are not solo parents. A 34-year-old female solo parent with one child applies for FLT but is refused admission; a male employee with no dependents who has similar qualifications is admitted. The solo-parent employee sues, alleging discrimination on the basis of solo-parent status under RA 9710 (Magna Carta of Women, as amended) and RA 8972, Sec. 7 (Solo Parents Welfare Act, as amended). (a) Identify the governing doctrine and the essential elements of discrimination based on gender or solo-parent status in employment. (b) Discuss whether the policy could be defended as a legitimate business necessity or whether it fails as discriminatory under the law. (c) Apply the facts: does the plaintiff’s treatment violate RA 9710 and RA 8972, Sec. 7 (as amended)? What relief should be awarded if discrimination is found?

Choose the Best Answer

RA 9710 does not apply to solo-parent discrimination; RA 8972 Sec. 7 protects solo parents only in terms of welfare benefits, not in employment track eligibility; the plaintiff’s claim would fail. Because the policy concerns solo-parent status, it is automatically invalid under RA 8972 Sec. 7; the plaintiff is entitled to the FLT and related remedies regardless of qualifications. The policy constitutes prohibited discrimination under RA 9710 and RA 8972 Sec. 7; there is direct discrimination based on solo-parent status; there is no legitimate business necessity shown; the plaintiff should be reinstated to FLT with back wages, and may recover damages including moral and exemplary damages and attorney's fees. The policy is facially neutral and does not target solo parents; the plaintiff must prove discriminatory intent; absent proof of intent, the policy should be upheld.

Load another random question

Your Progress

No data Retention

Tracked Cards: 0
Accuracy: No data
Retained: 0

View Detailed Analytics

Difficulty Breakdown

Answer flashcards to build a real score-based difficulty breakdown.

Current Streak 0 Days

Start a streak with this card.

Suggested Decks

View All

Leech Cards

Review

No recent weak flashcards in your saved workbook.

More

Flashcards Studio

Question

Choose the Best Answer

Hello